With the Dow Jones Industrial Average making new highs, Wall St. experts and pundits all agree that 2007 will be an up year for major indices. By the way, they
always agree that next year will be an up year. If things look particularly and undeniably bleak, then they'll predict a "second half recovery" but an up year all the same.
Nobody can say for sure what the future will bring. In general terms you can come out ahead simply betting against economists and weathermen. It may not work all the time, but I suspect it's statistically better than playing the lotto.
Modern day economists fulfill more of a cheerleading role than anything else. What economists basically do today is explain to the general public in easy-to-understand terms why anything bad that has just happened or is about to happen, is actually a good thing when you look at it from a different context, and why people should just go on about their business and not ask too many deeply probing questions about the current state of the economy or the financial system.
Examples include reporting core inflation figures ex-food and ex-fuel, not reporting M3 money supply at all, or explaining why adjustable rate mortages are a good thing when interest rates have nowhere to go but up and property values nowhere to go but down.
So one must decode this fog of obfuscation that surrounds all things economic and financial if one hopes to make a reasoned guess about the future.
Over the holidays I picked up two books with diametrically opposed hypotheses: The Coming Economic Collapse: How You Can Thrive When Oil Costs $200 a Barrel and The Next Great Bubble Boom: How to Profit from the Greatest Boom in History 2006-2010